Andrew Stanton article originally published by Unissu – then subsequiently appeared in RICS publication 9th January 2020
‘ConTech, which may or may not be a subset of PropTech, is in its infancy and receives only a tiny percentage of the tech sector funding budget, so in the next 30-years it is unlikely to become a mature technology. But, these two factors are not the main inhibitors to digital progress.
Construction sites fall into the category of ‘the built world’ where data is driving a cleverer way to build productivity and communication through the supply chain. We have all heard about ‘smart’ or ‘automated buildings’ where linked tech, make the space more responsive. At present we are only tinkering at the edges, concentrating on making lived in space a more comfortable cave to hang out in, either at work or at home.
There are exceptions, like Distech Controls who design spaces which “integrate disparate building systems from multiple vendors into one open platform, and dashboards that provide insight and visibility into operations, alarms such as equipment faults, and trends including energy usage.”
Similarly, HB Reavis are blazing the trail in the built workspace sector, with a tech/holistic approach, or as they say Symbiosy – a “mutual symbiosis between a space and the people.” Projects like the Nivy Tower in Bratislava, the upcoming Vinohradska in Prague and DSTRCT Berlin. But though the design systems will be utilising tech, it will be humans creating the reality.
With ConTech, there might be oportunities to further innovate in construction sites
I know you may be thinking, we have the tech to automate most industries, so surely Con Tech, through artificial intelligence and robotics, could easily dominate the construction sector – especially if construction moves towards digital prefabricated modular design.
ICON construction has Vulcan the robot, capable of 3D printing a property in 72-hours. Then there is SAM 100, the American Semi-Automated Mason, a bricklaying robot able to lay brick more than six times faster than a human: it does not rest, and it does not become injured. Or Hadrian X, the Australian robot with an inbuilt CAD system used for project management and construction, aided by dynamic stabilisation, which is undergoing final trials.
Maybe we are close to a technological watershed, an end to the thousands of accidents and fatalities in the construction sector worldwide, and a more planned and less wasteful industry.
“Maybe we are close to a technological watershed, an end to the thousands of accidents and fatalities in the construction sector worldwide, and a more planned and less wasteful industry. ”

Well yes, perhaps, but the example of the aerospace industry is useful; when I was a boy we landed on the moon, but the tech and resources were a massive dollar cost. So, 40-years later, spaceflight is not the norm, though mass production of small satellites may be on the up (and of course Elon Musk the space aviator is on a mission – though he has deep pockets).
Lack of investment is a primary factor holding back the introduction of a seamless automated, efficient and much needed disruptor to the industry. So too, people. And, as I saw recently in a successful award winning proptech pitch given by Nucon to HB Reavis, continued use of paper is an equally major stumbling block.
Let’s talk money: construction is a multi-billion-dollar game world-wide, next year it will generate US$ 24,334bn (in America alone it will generate US$ 1,293bn revenue). If you do the maths, you will see that there are some strong vested interests to keep the humans in construction, and some pretty big drivers to get Con Tech involved with all processes.
“Lack of investment is a primary factor holding back the introduction of a seamless automated, efficient and much needed disruptor to the industry. So too, people. But continued use of paper is an equally major stumbling block. ”
Let’s talk people: the big sticking point, putting aside unions, financial interests, etc is us humans. In America there are 7.2 million humans in construction; in China over 56 million are involved in building properties. Economically what are these people going to be doing if they leave the sector?
Finally, let’s talk paper: Malaysian based Nucon expounded a solution to the 20% cost of waste caused by defective processes in the built construction sector; at the heart of the company’s solution was the hidden fact that most of the construction industry is run on paper – not just in the planning phase, but at every painful point of the supply chain. Then, when defects occur, that is all written down as well.
This needs to be remedied and standardised globally, creating significant savings, efficiencies and transparency. This will allow for a ‘new way’ of constructing buildings. It will not be an overnight process.
Intriguingly, ConTech is the solution to the pivotal paradox that construction has: a massive and unending skills shortage, dating back three decades. This is why we should embrace the relentlessly efficient and never-sleeping machines that will, in time, plan, execute and build our shimmering utopian cities.
Analysis – December 2025
‘Here’s a data-supported assessment of whether Andrew Stanton’s RICS article from around five years ago about construction sites being human-free by 2050 was accurate, overly optimistic, or misplaced — based on technology, industry practice, labour markets, and current trends in automation (as of late 2025)’.
1. Stanton’s Core Claim (RICS 2020)
In the RICS article, Stanton argued that: ConTech (construction technology, including AI and robotics) might fundamentally change construction. That there was potential for highly automated construction sites and reduced reliance on human labour by 2050. However, the article also emphasised that ConTech was immature, under-funded, and not yet a mature industry — meaning that large-scale automation at that time was unlikely without significant investment and momentum.Bottom line of the original position, Stanton did not assert that sites for sure would be human-free by 2050, but rather that the idea was a possible future enabled by automation — contingent on overcoming structural barriers.
2. What Has Changed Since 2020? (Tech Adoption & Reality in 2025)
Robotics and Automation Progress – there is tangible deployment of robotics on construction projects today, but Robots are increasingly assisting, not replacing, humans. Most are used for specific tasks (e.g., autonomous excavation, bricklaying aids, repetitive work). These systems typically still require human operators or supervisors. Half of Amazon are now robots the other half are humans. Companies like Built Robotics are retrofitting heavy machinery to operate autonomously, yet human oversight remains necessary. Automation exists and is scaling, but it is not yet mature enough to fully remove the human workforce from job sites.3. What Does the Industry Itself Say About 2050?
Strategic industry groups and outlooks (e.g., the UK Construction Industry Council’s work toward 2050) indicate that the sector expects transformation, but with a major focus on sustainability, inclusivity, and skills development — not purely automation or human elimination. Construction Industry Council.
A Q & A of expectations as of 2025 reads like this.
Q – Is robotic replacement of humans a reality? A – Partial, task-specific, not full replacement.
Q – Do Autonomous construction sites exist? A – Experimental at best.
Q – Is a human workforce still required? A – Yes, especially for oversight, complex operations.
Q – Is there Technology maturity in the sector? A – Advancing, but not pervasive.
4. Final Analysis: Was Stanton “Right”?
Partly accurate, but not fully predictive, the accurate elements, Stanton correctly identified that automation would expand and that ConTech might reshape the industry. He understood that investment, digital transformation, and labour shortages were key drivers.Over-optimistic or aspirational elements are the notion, even implied of fully human-free sites by 2050 is not yet supported by how the industry is evolving. Construction automation remains complementary to human workers rather than a wholesale replacement. Institutional inertia, economic realities, regulatory and safety constraints, and complexity of construction tasks mean that full automation by 2050 is far from assured. Stanton’s broad forecasting of automation’s growing impact was justified, but the specific idea of construction sites being fully human-free by 2050 remains highly uncertain and unlikely in practice without major breakthroughs and policy/industry shifts.
Where Things Are Likely Heading (to 2050)
Rather than fully human-free sites, a more realistic trend is, “Humans + machines working collaboratively” with humans in higher-value roles (planning, supervision, exception handling). And Robotics and AI handling repetitive, dangerous, or highly standardised tasks. With off-site manufacturing (MMC) combining automation with human oversight. This hybrid model aligns with current research and industry deployment patterns. ccbp.org.uk
Andrew Stanton CEO Proptech-PR
Andrew Stanton Founder & Editor of 'PROPTECH-X' where his insights, connections, analysis and commentary on proptech and real estate are based on writing 1.3M words annually. Plus meeting 1,000 Proptech founders, critiquing 400 decks and having had 130 clients as CEO of 'PROPTECH-PR', a consultancy for Proptech founders seeking growth and exit strategies. He also acts as an advisory for major global real estate companies on sales, acquisitions, market positioning & operations. With 200K followers & readers, he is the 'Proptech Realestate Influencer.'












